Reference

Social media harm, by the numbers

Forty figures documenting what these platforms earn, what they do to people, what their own researchers found, and what happens when you leave. Every number traces to a primary document, court record, regulatory finding, or peer-reviewed study — with the year and the source named beside it. Free to cite; attribution appreciated.

Section 01

The business model

What your attention is worth, and where the money comes from.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
$200.97BMeta's total annual revenueMeta earnings reports2025
98%Share of Meta's revenue that comes from advertisingMeta earnings reports2025
$57.03Meta's average annual revenue per user worldwide (up from $49.63)Meta earnings reports2025
$250–350Meta's annual revenue per North American user — 5–6× the global averageMeta earnings reports2025
9%Year-over-year rise in average price per ad on MetaMeta earnings reports2025
~$16BRevenue Meta internally projected from scam, fraud, and banned-goods ads — about 10% of 2024 salesReuters, internal documents2025
15M/dayHigher-risk scam advertisements Meta showed users dailyReuters, internal documents2025

How the business model shapes the feed →

Section 02

Engineered outrage and addiction

The mechanics, measured — mostly by the companies themselves.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
How much more Facebook's algorithm weighted an "angry" reaction than a likeThe Facebook Files (WSJ)2021
689,003Users whose feeds Facebook secretly manipulated to test emotional contagion, without consentPNAS 111(24)2012/2014
13%Increase in sharing per additional moral-emotional word in a post (meta-analysis, N=4.8M posts)PNAS Nexus 4(11)2025
64%Share of extremist-group joins on Facebook driven by its own recommendation algorithmInternal study, Facebook Papers2020
35 minTikTok's internal estimate of time to "addiction" for a new user — about 260 videosUnsealed TikTok documents2024
1.5 minActual daily reduction in teen usage from TikTok's 60-minute screen-time "limit" (108.5 → 107 min)Unsealed TikTok documents2024
2.6 minHow quickly TikTok recommended suicide-related content to accounts registered as 13-year-oldsCCDH, "Deadly by Design"2022
93%Share of videos about depression served to a WSJ test account after ~36 minutes of profilingWSJ bot investigation2021

The Machine → · TikTok case file →

Section 03

Teen mental health

Including the findings Meta's own researchers produced and its executives read.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
1 in 3Teen girls for whom Instagram makes body image issues worse — Meta's own internal findingInternal Meta slide, leaked2020
66%Teen girls reporting negative social comparison on Instagram, in Meta's internal researchInternal Meta research2020
13%British teens with suicidal thoughts who traced the desire to Instagram, per Meta's research (US: 6%)Internal Meta research2021
51%Instagram users reporting a bad or harmful experience in the prior seven days, per Meta's own surveysBéjar, Senate testimony2023
~2%Share of reported harmful content that was actually removed, per the same internal surveysBéjar, Senate testimony2023
~145%Rise in major depression among U.S. teen girls, 2010–2020Haidt; Twenge & Campbell2010–20
0 of 85Self-harm posts removed by Instagram in a month-long Danish study, against a claimed ~99% removal rateDigitalt Ansvar2024
8 of 47Instagram teen-safety features that worked as advertised when independently tested"Teen Accounts, Broken Promises"2025

Instagram case file →

Section 04

Bots, fake accounts, and manufactured opinion

How much of the "conversation" is real — and how little it takes to bend it.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
51%Share of all web traffic that was automated — the first year bots passed humansImperva Bad Bot Report2024
3.5BFake accounts Facebook removed in a single year — about 43% of the world's populationMeta transparency data (VAB)2025
2.7×Peak ratio of fake accounts banned to actual monthly active usersMeta transparency data (VAB)2019
2–4%Share of a network that needs to be bots to flip its perceived majority opinion, in 2 of 3 simulationsEuropean Journal of Information Systems2019
6% → 31%Bots were 6% of accounts but spread 31% of tweets linking to low-credibility contentNature Communications 92018
18M of 22MPublic comments to the FCC on net neutrality that were fake; 8.5M used real people's stolen identitiesNY Attorney General2021
7,704Facebook accounts removed in the "Spamouflage" takedown — the largest known covert influence operationMeta Adversarial Threat Report2023
81 of 81Countries surveyed that showed organized social media manipulation campaignsOxford Internet Institute2020
0.32% → 80%2,107 "supersharers" — a third of one percent of a voter panel — spread 80% of election fake newsScience 3842024
25% → 97%The most active quarter of U.S. adults on Twitter produced 97% of all tweetsPew Research Center2021

The Bots case file →

Section 05

Fines, verdicts, and regulatory findings

What courts and regulators have concluded, with numbers attached.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
$5BFTC penalty against Facebook — largest ever against a tech company at the timeUS Federal Trade Commission2019
87MUsers whose data Cambridge Analytica harvested without consentGuardian / NYT investigation2018
€1.2BLargest GDPR fine ever issued, against Meta for EU–US data transfersIrish Data Protection Commission2023
$1.4BTexas biometric-data settlement with MetaTexas Attorney General2024
>$9BCumulative fines and settlements paid by Meta across all jurisdictionsCompiled regulatory actions2018–24
~$942MMeta's total liability in New Mexico's child-safety case ($375M verdict + $567M abatement)N.M. First Judicial District2026
126MAmericans reached by Russian Internet Research Agency content on FacebookSenate Intelligence Committee2015–17

Facebook case file → · Full bibliography →

Section 06

What happens when you leave

The other side of the ledger — all from randomized trials.

FigureWhat it measuresSourceYear
25–40%Well-being gain from 4 weeks off Facebook, as a share of the effect of clinical depression treatmentAmerican Economic Review 110(3)2020
~1 hourTime returned per day by deactivating Facebook — redistributed to socializing, exercise, and sleepAmerican Economic Review 110(3)2020
12%Lasting voluntary reduction in Facebook use after a paid four-week deactivation endedAmerican Economic Review 110(3)2020
1 weekTime off social media that produced significant improvements in well-being, depression, and anxietyCyberpsychology (Univ. of Bath RCT)2022
30 min/dayCap that significantly reduced loneliness and depression within three weeksJ. Social & Clinical Psychology (UPenn)2018
g = 0.17–0.25Pooled effect size of reducing social media, across 42 randomized trials — small but consistentTwo meta-analyses (N=1,491; N=5,544)2024–25
~821 hoursAnnual cost of average social media use — 34 full days, or 51 waking daysDataReportal / We Are Social2024

What you get back →

On using these numbers. Every figure above is linked to its primary source on the Sources page and discussed in context on the page named beside it. Two honest caveats worth carrying with the numbers: effect sizes in the quitting literature are small-to-moderate averages, not promises of transformation; and every bot and fake-account estimate is exactly that — an estimate, made harder to verify since Meta shut down its CrowdTangle research tool in 2024. Where evidence is contested, the case files say so.

Numbers are the argument

Every figure here came from a document someone tried to keep private, a court that ruled, or a study that ran the experiment. The practical response is on one page.